{"id":482,"date":"2009-01-28T23:17:05","date_gmt":"2009-01-29T03:17:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/?p=482"},"modified":"2009-01-28T23:17:05","modified_gmt":"2009-01-29T03:17:05","slug":"yet-another-peculiarity-of-the-english-language","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/?p=482","title":{"rendered":"Yet Another Peculiarity of the English Language"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Until I sat down today to compile a review worksheet on Latin prepositions, I had never noticed an inconsistency or inconcinnity in the names of the parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.  If non-visible frequencies of light are seen as metaphorically going beyond or falling short of the visible spectrum, the opposite of &#8216;ultraviolet&#8217; should be &#8216;citrared&#8217;. On the other hand, if they are seen as metaphorically placed above or below the visible spectrum, the opposite of &#8216;infrared&#8217; should be &#8216;suprared&#8217;. I wonder if other languages are more logical or (if you like) more pedantically Latinate.<\/p>\n<p>Which reminds me: when I first saw the word &#8216;infrared&#8217; in (I suppose) 5th or 6th grade, I thought it was a disyllable, the perfect passive participle of a verb infrare* that I had somehow never run across before. I wonder if that is a common misapprehension.<\/p>\n<p>And speaking of illogic: why does the spell-checker tell me to write &#8216;pedantically&#8217; rather than &#8216;pedanticly&#8217;? There&#8217;s no such word as &#8216;pedantical&#8217;. I suppose I could research this, but I have more worksheets to put together before I go to bed. I would have thought that two Snow Days in a row would be enough to catch up on my work and my blogging, but apparently not.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Until I sat down today to compile a review worksheet on Latin prepositions, I had never noticed an inconsistency or inconcinnity in the names of the parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. If non-visible frequencies of light are seen as metaphorically going beyond or falling short of the visible spectrum, the opposite of &#8216;ultraviolet&#8217; should be [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-482","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-orbilius","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/482","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=482"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/482\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":483,"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/482\/revisions\/483"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=482"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=482"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.drweevil.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=482"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}