A site-specific search function can be very handy in confirming (or not) one's first impressions about a blogger's vocabulary. For the fourth time in the last eight months, and the third time in the last four, the blogger who calls himself 'Hesiod Theogeny' has referred to opponents as "urine-stained". (I won't link to him, but the post is dated April 24th, 7:23:38 PM.) It's an unusual locution, and his use of it is beginning to seem a little obsessive. It may be worth asking why he is so fond of it. Here are some possibilities:

1. 'Hesiod' has always been quite mysterious about his day job. Is this an inadvertent clue? Perhaps he's a plumber, a washroom attendant, or a hospital orderly, maybe even a urologist or regional sales manager for Depends.
2. Is the repetition a statistical artifact, a side-effect of other factors? His weblog combines voluminous production with low quality and adolescent attitudes -- not to mention an unhealthy dose of wide-ranging hatred and contempt -- and this would naturally result in the overuse of bathroom epithets.
3. 'Hesiod' has often shown himself willing and eager to defile, degrade, and dehumanize everyone on the other side of the political spectrum. I've asked before in some comment section or other, but it's worth asking again: does the wording indicate a wish-fulfillment fantasy? Does 'Hesiod' call his opponents "urine-stained" because of his ill-concealed and (I hope) subconscious desire to urinate on them? I certainly hope it has nothing to do with his own personal sexual practices or medical problems.